An official in Henan was sentenced to five years for accepting 50000 bribes in the purchase of instruments
the bidding process of purchasing equipment is also a place where customers are eager to improve. The director of Fisheries accepted bribes and helped others win the bid. As a result, he was sentenced to five years in prison. On January 12, the people's Court of Luoshan County, Henan Province concluded the bribery case, and sentenced the defendant Li Mou to bribery and five years' imprisonment
the court found that during the period from 2007 to 2008, when the defendant Li served as the former director of the Fisheries Bureau of a county in Xinyang City, he took advantage of his position in charge of the construction of the aquatic animal epidemic prevention and control station project in the county, and during the bidding process of purchasing instruments and equipment for the project, By hinting that other bid evaluators must give high scores to a science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. in Henan Province and myself in the construction of structural engineering, they helped the company win the bid, and accepted a bribe of 50000 yuan from the company's manager Wang twice before and after the bid evaluation. On June 3, 2010, the staff of the procuratorial organ came to the Bureau and brought him to the procuratorial organ for investigation and conversation. The defendant Li confessed the fact of his bribery. After the incident, he returned all the accounts
after hearing, the court held that the defendant, Mr. Li, as a national staff member, took advantage of his position to invite tenders for the purchase of instruments and equipment for the project. The main reason for this phenomenon was that at present, the domestic sealing machine industry lacked professional packaging technology personnel. He illegally received 50000 yuan to help a science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. in Henan win the bid, and his behavior constituted the crime of bribery. After the jetpreg process of producing honeycomb core reinforced composites, he confessed and refunded all the accounts, which can be given a lighter punishment according to law. The court then made the above judgment
note: the reprinted content is indicated with the source. The reprint is for the purpose of transmitting more information, and does not mean to agree with its views or confirm the authenticity of its content
LINK
Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI